• About us
  • ISSN 3049-978X
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
Central Bylines
Advertisement
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Transport
    • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
    • Food
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Sport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Technology
  • Region
    • East Midlands
    • West Midlands
    • A Cotswold Diary
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Transport
    • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
    • Food
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Sport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Technology
  • Region
    • East Midlands
    • West Midlands
    • A Cotswold Diary
No Result
View All Result
Central Bylines
Home Lifestyle History

The Rwanda policy and Madagascar

Mike Stafford compares the Rwanda policy to one used by the Third Reich for deporting people to Madagascar.

Mike Stafford by Mike Stafford
03-05-2022 07:00 - Updated on 12-02-2023 10:33
in History, Home Affairs
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
Men behind a fence

Picture Gerd Altmann Pixabay

Share on Bluesky

If you have more than a passing acquaintance with history, you will often hear its echoes in current affairs. Sometimes it will be a heartening, familiar chime, as seen early in the pandemic when the Queen channelled Vera Lynn in promising a locked-down Britain that “we’ll meet again.” Sometimes, however, history’s echoes will come as a hideous siren, bellowing its warning to those that will hear. When the Johnson government unveiled its plans to deport refugees to Rwanda, that siren was deafening.

Repeating history?

In June 1940, senior Nazi official Franz Rademacher recommended a different African nation as a venue for forced deportations – Madagascar. Rademacher’s plan was developed by Adolf Eichmann, who in August 1940 called for a million Jews per year to be deported to the African island nation. This plan was ultimately shelved as unworkable due to the British naval blockade of Germany, but the malignant intentions behind it provide a bleak foreshadowing of what was to come.

Johnson’s Rwanda wheeze may too be revealed as unworkable in due course, but impracticality should never be the last line of defence when it comes to human rights.

There are, of course, key distinctions between the regimes. The Nazi project was genocidal in its very core; its worldview was a poisonous stew of hatreds, exacerbated by the eugenicism in vogue at the time. The Johnson project has no ideological core; when Johnson’s government engages in bigotry, it does so out of cynical opportunism.

The Nazi project was a bacteria that grew in the petri-dish of Europe post-WWI; violence carried no taboo, certainly not among a population that had seen the fields of Europe turned into a charnel house. The Johnson project, by contrast, is an exercise in adventure tourism, made possible by seven decades of peace and relative prosperity. Johnson’s government is in his own mould; a sophomoric vandal accustomed to the real grown-ups clearing up after it.

Fascism and Nazism

For a nation whose founding myth was born beneath the bombs of Hitler’s Germany, it is obscene that we are entertaining policy ideas that once held sway there. Modern Britain’s origin story, in all its imperfection and selective telling, is that of a nation that made immense sacrifices to defeat the cruelty and tyranny of the Axis powers. In victory, our greatest generation created space for participatory democracy, respect for law and truth, respect for human rights, and – often forgotten – for the slaying of Beveridge’s five giants (Want, Disease, Ignorance, Squalor and Idleness).

They may seem dusty now, but these values still represent the standard against which modern Britain should measure its success. Everything our governments do should be conducted in the noble and virtuous tradition which vanquished Nazism. It is not enough to see just a cigarette paper’s distance between British government policy and that of the 20th century autocracies; a vast, yawning chasm should exist between the two, as exists between good and evil.

Whenever a British prime minister sees fascism’s ugly seeds being planted, they should tear them from the soil and cast them into the fire.

Defending British values

Those endless rows of white marble crosses in the fields of Normandy are not theatrical props; every single one of them carries an obligation to subsequent generations of British leaders, to preserve the security and decency of the world that the men beneath them helped to create.

This should be done not with a wry smile or a smirk, but with a solemn understanding that Britain understands the horrors that await when human rights, the rule of law or democracy are discarded. It should be done with the understanding that, at its core, Britain will defend these values to the death.

In flirting with the kind of deportation plans that once filled the memoranda of the Third Reich, Johnson isn’t just trolling the left, or throwing red meat to the base. He is lending undeserved dignity to the kind of ideas Britain endured so much to extinguish. In doing so, he disgraces the nation which he claims to serve.

Tags: Rwanda
Previous Post

This writer’s life: a diary

Next Post

Closing days of the local elections: what are the candidates saying in Allens Cross?

Mike Stafford

Mike Stafford

Mike Stafford is a writer, book critic and Labour activist from Worcester. A campaigner in a key marginal, he dedicates his free time to the persuasion of swing voters.

Related Posts

The Bronze Sculpture Was Created By Internationally Renowned Polish Artist Alicja Biała, With Help From Hundreds Of People Who Attended Her Workshops (LDRS)
East Midlands

New Maid Marian statue unveiled in Nottingham

by Central Bylines Reports
18 July 2026 - Updated on 19 July 2026
Unmarked grave in a field
HERstory

Ruth Ellis: what her posthumous pardon tells us about Britain’s view of abuse then, and now

by The Conversation
14 July 2026 - Updated on 17 September 2026
Fleet Air Arm aboard HMS Implacable
History

Remembering D-Day: Leonard’s story part 2

by Judy Copage
6 June 2026
Fleet Air Arm aboard HMS Implacable
History

Remembering D-Day: Leonard’s story part 1

by Judy Copage
6 June 2026
Long wooden boat with protective shields on the sides and dragon head on one end and a dragon tail on the other
History

Beyond Anglo‑Saxons, Celts and Vikings: DNA uncovers a dynamic history of migration to Britain

by The Conversation
30 May 2026 - Updated on 17 September 2026
Next Post
Author Mounsay

Closing days of the local elections: what are the candidates saying in Allens Cross?

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

AI Art Back in the News Blue Plaques brexit Christmas Climate change Community Conservative Party Cost of living crisis Covid D-Day Dance election Energy Entertainment equality Farming Gaza General Election Green Party health history housing Human Rights immigration Johnson Labour Latest Levelling up Lib Dems mental health My Little Town nature Poetry Police pollution quiz Reform Reform UK Rwanda social media Ukraine Conflict Voting Whistleblower
Central Bylines

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in Central England and beyond.

Central Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About us
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • The Lost Opportunities List
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2020-2026 Central Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-978X

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Transport
    • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
    • Food
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Sport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Technology
  • Region
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2020-2026 Central Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-978X